First published: Sat 16 Aug 2025.
Els Slots
Photos, More Photos!
Comments
10 comments
Els Slots
1 week, 4 days ago (Aug 17, 2025)
The wild animal photos are streaming in already. Two additional tips for them:
1. Try to find a photo where there is some space/landscape around the animal, because when it is a close-up it will not show well in the banner.
2. And if you have a suitable animal photo as part of your old review photos, you need to resubmit that one (as the old photos were stored very small)
Reply
nan
1 week, 4 days ago (Aug 17, 2025)
Two comments:
* For searching images, a proper title is key. We now have 16k images, so it's not easy to find one.
* Generally, we should aim to use the description field as we show that to visually impaired and it's also best practice for SEO/AI.
I added linked few Rideau pictures with their respective locations. I think we will make the format a bit better.
Mid-term I will add a dedicated gallery feature.
Els Slots
1 week ago (Aug 20, 2025)
A progress update on the Ecology-related photos (also found on the Forum and kept up-to-date there). We are still lacking the following ones, the others mentioned above have been covered:
· Anchialine Habitats (very specific, maybe someone has been to Yongcheon Lava Tube Lake?)
· Cambrian Explosion (Burgess Shale?)
· Cave-dwelling fauna
· Desman (good luck)
· Erg
· Feral Animals
· Fish
· Gray Wolf
· Gypsum
· Ice Cave
· Lava Lakes
· Lazarus species (again: good luck!)
· Living fossils
· Mammoths
· Notable Extremophiles
· Pangolin
· Permafrost mounds
· Salamanders
· Sea stacks
· Snow leopards
· Taiga
· Tiger habitat
· Yardangs
Ilya Burlak
4 days, 9 hours ago (Aug 23, 2025)
Hi Els, a question for clarity. I went, out of curiosity, through all of my visited TWHS to see if any of them appeared as "empty blocks" in the list. I see Stolac in Bosnia as an example. There is my review of it from 2019, with a picture that is named "Stolac", and another by Thibault Magnien from a year earlier with a picture that is also named "Stolac". There is also an actual picture next to the description on the site page, also named "Stolac". I am suddenly confused why Stolac would appear as an empty purple block on the list. Are you saying in this post that a separate upload of just a picture without a review is needed to be used as the identifying picture?
Els Slots
4 days, 4 hours ago (Aug 24, 2025)
Hi Ilya. They are empty because the old photos are too small. They should be uploaded again in full size (or new pictures of those sites in full size). You can also see that the picture that is now on the site page is too small (it should not be there anyway).
Ralf Regele
3 days, 21 hours ago (Aug 24, 2025)
This might be a good place to elaborate on the uploading process a bit more: I assume "sent via Images" means: Have a user account -> Login -> Go to the Images tab -> Click Add Images
As a test, I tried uploading images for the missing german TWHS. But how will they find their way into the corresponding sections ? Do you manually go through all new images to see if they can be used somewhere ? How should the naming/tagging/description be done to be helpful ? I added "THWS", "Germany" and "(WHS name)" as tags, is this useful ?
nan
3 days, 21 hours ago (Aug 24, 2025)
The default admin view shows the latest pics, so if you pick a good title, Els has no issue matching them.
Els Slots
3 days, 17 hours ago (Aug 24, 2025)
As Nan said: it is simple. Just put the (short) name of the site in the title and I will match it. Just call it what it is, like "Vienna Hofburg" or "Struve Tartu". I generally add most of the pictures to a page, but not 100% of them. Sometimes there are already better photos by others present, or your photo isn't fully sharp, etc.